Process to compel Appearance through Summon under CrPC

The Code prescribes mainly two processes to compel the attendance of the accused i.e. issuance of summons to him or issuance of warrant and arresting him. It is completely within the discretion of the Magistrate to prefer one method over other. But such discretion must be exercised judicially.
The Code prescribes mainly two processes to compel the attendance of the accused i.e. issuance of summons to him or issuance of warrant and arresting him. It is completely within the discretion of the Magistrate to prefer one method over other. But such discretion must be exercised judicially.
judge, hammer, auction hammer-3665164.jpg

Introduction

To meet the ends of justice, it is critical to produce the accused and other witness or related parties before the court whenever needed.

If the accused is found guilty at the conclusion of the trial, he must be present in person to receive the sentence. Also, his presence is necessary if imprisonment is to be enforced.

There are 6 modes under Cr.P.C to compel the appearance of persons before court: –

  1. Summons
  2. Warrant of arrest
  3. Proclamation
  4. Attachment
  5. Warrant in lieu of summon and
  6. Bond of appearance

Summon

Summon is a legal document issued by a court in a person in a legal proceeding like accused or witness.  In other words it is authoritative call to the accused persons to appear in court to answer to a charge of an offence.

Basically, it is issued for compelling –

  1. The attendance of accused or witness (Section 61-69)
  2. Production of any document or things (section 91 of CrPC )

Form of Summons :

Essential contents of summons are :- 

  • Summons shall be in writing.
  • It must be in duplicate form.
  • It must be signed and sealed by the presiding officer of the court or such other officer authorised by the High Court.
  • It must mention the time and place of the rule directed and
  • It must bear the seal of the court.

The form of summon to an accused person is given in schedule -II Form No. 1 of the code of criminal procedure code 1973.

Types of Summons :

General Summons (61-69) :

  • Format of summons to accused is provided Form-1 of Schedule-II of Criminal Procedure Code 1973.
  • Format of summons to witness is provided Form- 33 of Schedule-II of Criminal Procedure Code 1973.

Special Summon : Section 206 Form-30 of Schedule-II of Criminal Procedure Code 1973

Methods of Serving of Summon:

Personal Service (Section 62): Every summons shall be served by a police officer, or subject to such rules as the State Government may make in this behalf, by an officer of the Court issuing it or other public servant.

(2) The summons shall, if practicable, be served personally on the person summoned, by delivering or tendering to him one of the duplicates of the summons.

(3) Every person on whom a summons is so served shall, if so required by the serving officer, sign a receipt therefor on the back of the other duplicate.

Who can serve the summons?

  • a police officer, or
  • by an officer of the Court issuing it, or
  • other public servant.

Case Law:

E.Chathu vs Gopalan : Where the person sought to be summoned is employed abroad , the court , if it considers proper can send summons to the concerned Embassy official for the purpose of service. It was further held that officers working in the Indian embassy abroad are certainly ‘public servants’ whose assistance can be sought by court in serving summons.

Service to corporate bodies:

Service of a summons on a corporation may be effected through two ways –

  1. By serving it on
    • Secretary of Corporation
    • Local manager of corporation
    • Other principal officer of the corporation
  2. By letter sent by registered post address to the chief officer of the corporation in India.

Explanation. -In this section, “corporation” means an incorporated company or other corporate and includes a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.

Though societies registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, may not be formally incorporated, yet the Explanation by its inclusive definition brings them under the present section.

In the case of Central Bank of India vs DDA 1981 , that branch manager is a local manager and if summon has been served on him, the service shall deemed to have been effected on the company.

Extended Service:

  • Service to Adult Male member: 64 of CrPC (Extended Service of Summons). Where the person summoned cannot be found by the exercise of due diligence, the summons may be served by leaving one of the duplicates for him with some adult male member of his family residing with him, and the person with whom the summons is so left shall, if so, required by the(serving officer sign a receipt therefor on the back of the other duplicate.
    Explanation. -A servant is not a member of the family within the meaning of this section.
    If irrespective of proper and sincere efforts, the serving officer failed to deliver the summons to the person summoned personally then under Section 64 of the Code, it can be delivered to some other member of the family, who is satisfying following conditions
    • He is adult (Age more than 18 years)
    • He is a male
    • He is not insane or intoxicated
    • He should be residing with the person summoned.

      A duplicate copy of the summons should be left with the person receiving it. Explanation clearly mentions that a servant is not a member of the family within the meaning of this section.

      In Hemendra Nath v. Archana, 1971 CrLJ 817 (Cal) case, the Court held that to justify service under Section 64 of CrPC, it should be shown that proper efforts were made to find the person summoned.
      In the new act which is now known as Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita now the extended service of summon can be done to any adult member of the family which includes male and female both.

      Affix Duplicates at some Conspicuous Place: According to section 65 CrPC, when service cannot be affected as provided under sections 62, 63, 64, the duplicate of summons shall be affixed to some conspicuous part of the house in which the person summoned resides. This is also known as substituted service of summons.

Service on Government Servant: (Section 66):

According to section 66 , When a Government Servant is to be summoned and is in active service of the Government, then the summons in duplicate shall ordinarily be sent to the Head of the office in which such person is employed. Now, the head of the office is bound to serve the summon to such person in the manner provided under section 62 of the Code. And after obtaining signature on the back of the duplicate from such person, he has to return the signed copy with endorsement to the Court. Such signature shall be evidence of due service.

Service of summons outside local limits

There are two provisions regarding service of summons outside local limits which has been mentioned in Section 67 and Section 68.

  1. Service of summons outside local limits (Section 67):
    When a Court wants to summon someone beyond its local jurisdiction then the Court should send such summons in duplicate to a Magistrate under whose jurisdiction the person resides. The Magistrate under whose jurisdiction the person resides issue it to concerned police officer to serve it.
  2. Proof of service when serving officer not present: :
    Under section 68 of the code provisions regarding proof of service when serving officer is not present has been provided. According to Section 68, When a summons issued by a Court is served outside its local jurisdiction, and in any case where the officer who has served a summons is not present at the hearing of the case, an affidavit, purporting to be made before a Magistrate, that such summons has been served, and a duplicate of the summons purporting to be endorsed (in the manner provided by section 62 or section 64) by the person to whom it was delivered or tendered or with whom it was left, shall be admissible in evidence, and the statements made therein shall be deemed to be correct unless and until the contrary is proved.
    The affidavit mentioned in this section may be attached to the duplicate of the summons are returned to the Court.
    Sometimes the jurisdiction in which the person resides lies very much away from the jurisdiction of the Court who has issued summons, that the serving officer of the jurisdiction in which the person resides is unable to attend the trials. In such a case he can make an affidavit saying that he has served the summons in the manner provided by this chapter and provisions of section 62 and 64 has been complied with meticulously.

     

Service of Summons on witness by Post Section 69 The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: The Summons to witness can be served by post. It can also be served through registered post. When postman is delivering it to such person and he refused to accept it and the postman put a remark on it that the receiver refused to accept, then it is considered as evidence and the issuing Court may declare that the summons is duly served.

This section intends to avoid delay in the service of summons on witness. This section is confined to witness only, it means that summons cannot be served through this accused.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Share:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *